Contact us
25.5.2012

CJEU Clarifies Liability for Open Wi-Fi Networks in Copyright Infringement Cases

EVENT DETAILS
Date:
Location:
Summary

CJEU | Case C-484/14 | McFadden v. Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH | 15 September 2016

In its judgment in Case C-484/14 McFadden v. Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that providers of free public Wi-Fi are not directly liable for copyright infringements committed by users. However, the Court allowed that injunctions could be imposed to require network operators to password-protect their Wi-Fi services to prevent future infringements. The decision balances copyright protection with the promotion of free internet access across the EU.

cONTINUE rEADING

Key Legal Issues

  • Liability of open Wi-Fi network operators for copyright infringement committed by users.
  • Compatibility of national law obligations with the EU E-Commerce Directive.
  • Limits on injunctions that can be imposed on service providers offering public internet access.

CJEU Defines Scope of Liability for Open Wi-Fi Providers

On 15 September 2016, the CJEU addressed the long-standing tension between open internet access and copyright enforcement.
The case arose when Mr. McFadden, a shop owner in Germany, provided free open Wi-Fi to attract customers. An unknown user used the network to unlawfully share copyrighted music owned by Sony Music, prompting legal action.

The CJEU found that merely providing internet access constitutes a “mere conduit” service under Article 12 of the EU E-Commerce Directive, thereby shielding network providers from direct liability for content transmitted through their networks.

Possibility of Injunctions Against Open Wi-Fi Providers

Although exempt from direct liability, open Wi-Fi operators may still face injunctions requiring preventive measures.
The Court ruled that authorities can order Wi-Fi providers to implement reasonable security measures, such as requiring a password, to reduce unlawful use. However, such measures must be proportionate and must not disproportionately burden the provider or infringe on users' rights to freedom of information.

This nuanced approach encourages the continued availability of public internet access while acknowledging the rights of copyright holders.

Implications for Malta and EU Digital Strategy

For Malta, a jurisdiction promoting both technology adoption and compliance with EU digital standards, this decision is highly relevant.
Public Wi-Fi operators, hotels, cafés, and businesses offering internet access must be aware of their limited liability status but also of their obligations to implement reasonable safeguards against misuse.

From a strategic perspective, Malta’s framework for digital services can continue to support widespread internet accessibility while encouraging responsible operational practices, aligning with both EU law and the national drive towards a smart, connected economy.

Balancing Innovation and Rights Protection in the Digital Age

The McFadden ruling reaffirms that while fostering connectivity and innovation remains a priority across the European Union, these goals must be balanced against the legitimate interests of copyright owners.
Malta, as an emerging digital hub, stands to benefit from adopting policies that ensure both open internet access and responsible network management, setting a benchmark for smart, sustainable digital growth within the EU.

continue learning
Contact us

Speak to a
recognised expert