Contact us
Published:
26.4.2013
Last Updated:
25.7.2024

Standard & Poor confirm that Malta differs from Cyprus

4 min read
By
No items found.
EVENT DETAILS
Date:
Location:
Summary

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has affirmed that the collapse of Cyprus’ banking system has very limited direct implications for small financial-services-focused countries like Malta and Luxembourg. Whilst the size of Malta's financial system is large, relative to the economy's output, domestic banks in Malta are considerably smaller as a proportion of GDP, with a stronger and more stable asset quality.
 

cONTINUE rEADING

In a recent report issued by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (entitled "Small Countries, Big Banking Systems: How Malta And Luxembourg Differ From Cyprus"), S&P has affirmed that the collapse of Cyprus’ banking system has very limited direct implications for small financial-services-focused countries like Malta and Luxembourg. Whilst the size of Malta's financial system is large, relative to the economy's output, domestic banks in Malta are considerably smaller as a proportion of GDP, with a stronger and more stable asset quality.

The difficulties currently faced by Cypriot banks are mainly the result of their lending schemes, particularly the impaired loans to the Greek public and private sectors. The value of the Cypriot banks’ assets is significantly less than the banks' liabilities. In contrast, Malta's financial system encompasses a relatively clear segregation between international and domestic banking activity, which results in almost no spill-over from international activities into Malta's domestic economy. International banks mainly use Malta as a booking center for foreign-exchange loans, yet they neither take local deposits, nor lend to Maltese residents.

Malta's domestic banks' are mainly funded by retail deposits of Maltese customers, and they supply loans to diversified sectors of the Maltese economy. Assets in Malta have maintained their credit quality, whilst exposures to insolvent borrowers are sparse and under control. Moreover, domestic banks are not exposed to high and deteriorating credit risk to the extent of Cyprus' banks. What is more, no banks in Malta currently depend on financial support from the Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA).

S&P provide as follows: "In our view, no other economy in Europe matches Cyprus' profile of constrained fiscal flexibility together with a financially concentrated economy", " assets in Malta and Luxembourg have retained their credit quality, and exposures to insolvent borrowers have remained low and manageable" and "no banks in Malta or Luxembourg currently rely on financial support from the Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA)". 

S&P concludes by stating that it sees limited direct implications from the Cypriot banking failure for Malta and Luxembourg. 

key contacts
No items found.
what's inside

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has affirmed that the collapse of Cyprus’ banking system has very limited direct implications for small financial-services-focused countries like Malta and Luxembourg. Whilst the size of Malta's financial system is large, relative to the economy's output, domestic banks in Malta are considerably smaller as a proportion of GDP, with a stronger and more stable asset quality.
 

Article

Copyright © 2025 Chetcuti Cauchi. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking any action based on the contents of this document. Chetcuti Cauchi disclaims any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. Reproduction of reasonable portions of the content is permitted for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution is given and the content is not altered or presented in a false light.

Key contacts
No items found.
continue learning
testimonials

What success sounds like,from our clients

No items found.

Related Insights

No items found.
Contact us

Speak to a
recognised expert